cake-fiend's avatar

cake-fiend

SCIENCE!
19 Watchers37 Deviations
14.9K
Pageviews

Plz accounts

1 min read
This is my own collection of some plz accounts, just so I can remember them. I'm starting out with just a few.

:iconyoumustbenewhereplz: :iconmindblownplz: :iconwtfisthisplz: :iconitsbeautifulplz: :iconidgafplz: :iconreactionplz:
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Solarspawn had something to say about my deviation 'o rly?':

No poise is unique. That would be impossible with the billions of representations on the web today. A close examination of two images however can reveal that, while the poses are VERY close and quite classical in fact, the are very different. You can find hundreds more very close to them. It is as classical as a straight on view of an owls face. Such poses to tend to repeat and look similar at first glance. Being ass holes rather than artists you would not be expected to see the signs we artists see that demonstrate the image is original. More importantly, as already stated I am going to be doing a summer long live program along that very river demonstrating the very art you doubt ~ leaving all of deviantART seeing you creeps for the assholes you truly are. There was a featured article just yesterday I believe it was on copyright by a member here who is a professional writer and illustrator that demonstrated how many of her own characters were almost exactly duplicated in pose by other artists here, even before she created her own. A pose is not an element of originality, nor can it be copy writed. Originality is a factor of composition. But vicious little idiots out to undermine young artists with more skill than they would not be expected to know that. Well, I am not so young ~ and I will gladly plow you a new one to protect the decent artists here who want to learn.

I will break it down for my response.

No poise is unique. That would be impossible with the billions of representations on the web today. A close examination of two images however can reveal that, while the poses are VERY close and quite classical in fact, the are very different

It isn't just the pose. It's the shadows as well, the pattern of lights and darks; they are exactly the fucking same. It's incredibly obvious that that they are the same bird and denying it only makes you look even more retarded. Of course the pose isn't exactly the same, the one wing is off but it's easy to see that you just manipulated the wing in photoshop, it would be so easy to do that even one as inept at photoshop as you could do it. While the end half of the wing has been changed, I can still see that it came from the picture I found.

You can find hundreds more very close to them.

Sure you can find more that are CLOSE to them, but not this close.

It is as classical as a straight on view of an owls face.

Stupid statement. An owls face is not nearly as dynamic as this shot. The bird is flying. The angle of the bird, angle of the shot, position of the wings, lighting; so many more variables go into this shot than a photo of an owl that isn't flying. Even two straight on photos of an owl, unless taken at the same time of the same bird, will not look as similar as these two herons.

Such poses to tend to repeat and look similar at first glance. Being ass holes rather than artists you would not be expected to see the signs we artists see that demonstrate the image is original.

Oh please, I have great observational skills. Every time you say I'm not an artist you just make yourself look more retarded. We all know that if I sucked up to you like you want you would consider me an artist, but since I don't buy your bullshit I'm some hate mongering enemy of all things that are art.

More importantly, as already stated I am going to be doing a summer long live program along that very river demonstrating the very art you doubt ~

Gee, can't wait to not be impressed.

leaving all of deviantART seeing you creeps for the assholes you truly are.

It's funny that you think we are the assholes. When someone critiques my art, no matter what their skill level, I take it gratefully. You, you say that such a lowly untalented person has no right to critique your work. The vast majority of (real) professionals would not say such things because they, like the rest of us, understand that you don't have to be a cook to know the meal tastes like shit. People with no artistic training might not be able to evaluate and explain why something doesn't look good, and they may not see everything that is wrong with a picture, but that doesn't mean that they can't tell the difference between good art and bad art.
You think I don't understand bullying and how it affects people. Bullshit. I was badly bullied as a kid. I know what bullying looks like, and this is not that. This is not me calling you names and taunting you because you are old or disabled. This is me calling you out on your behavior and your lies, lies which you repeatedly say you can refute but never do (and no, none of the pictures you have posted actually prove anything wrong, and you are retarded for thinking they do)..
Basically, stop being an egotistical dickhole

But vicious little idiots out to undermine young artists with more skill than they would not be expected to know that. Well, I am not so young ~ and I will gladly plow you a new one to protect the decent artists here who want to learn.

I encourage young people with skill who want to learn, these are the people I prefer to watch on DA. I don't believe they will learn anything from you.

Stop accusing me of being some hate mongerer that hates everything you do out of jealousy or some hatred of disabled people who have found ways around their disability.
I actually really like the work center you have made for yourself, I believe that you know how to engrave and work with plastics.
I do not believe most of the claims you have made about yourself, they are just ridiculous. You talk about working in a Chinese sweatshop, designing boats, selling art to presidents and kings, winning the wizard wars (btw you never did give me the link to where it says you had anything to do with that), defeating cults, and now some weird crap about a rare subspecies of macaque that doesn't even exist. How do you expect us to not be skeptical? We are being no more skeptical than we ought to be.

That's all for now.
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Featured
No Featured Journals Yet
Check back soon for cake-fiend's first featured journal.